Comments on: Openmoko Framework Initiative

By: seeseekey.net

seeseekey.net — Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:06:26 +0000

[...] Links zu diesem Thema: http://www.vanille-media.de/site/index.php/2008/05/05/openmoko-framework-initiative/ http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/OpenmokoFramework [...]

By: la martina

la martina — Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:27:12 +0000

Pretty good post, this is one of the best posts that I have ever seen! This is a great site and I have to congratulate you on the content

By: La Martina

La Martina — Sun, 11 Jul 2010 13:50:48 +0000

Finally I have got Openmoko that what I want.Thanks, but I am not getting the exactly process so please inform me through e-mail.

By: Invictus deus ex machina

Invictus deus ex machina — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:21:52 +0000

Es kommt……

Noch knapp zwei Wochen (heute wird mal großzügig geschätzt) dann ist mein Freerunner hier Aus diesem Anlass habe ich mich mal wieder ein bisschen intensiver auf den Openmoko Seiten umgeschaut. Als erstes ist mir ins Auge gefallen das zur Zeit an ei…

By: mickey

mickey — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 23:05:09 +0000

@sh: Unfortunately Openmoko dropped out of the accessory business. I hope that we will have the chance to manufacture some of these things as giveaways on fairs etc.

By: mickey

mickey — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 23:04:11 +0000

@JMichel: The old libmoko* design was similar in concept and goals, however we failed to see the relevance of detaching applications and services as well as languages and libraries. Back then, we forced everyone to do Gtk+ and C. Now, everything that speaks dbus can use the full service architecture. We can then collaborate in services, but compete on the UI layer (which would inevitably happen — think Qt, wxWidgets, Qtopia, special vertical market needs w/ text interfaces etc.).

By: sh

sh — Wed, 21 May 2008 07:45:10 +0000

Sorry, a bit OT…

One question: how can I get the ‘OpenMoko’ Lanyard without buying the whole old Neo1973 (I want a Freerunner instead ;).
Where is the order page for the OM Lanyards?

Thank you!

By: JMichel

JMichel — Tue, 20 May 2008 15:36:46 +0000

It is really not clear to me what is the goal of this change. What is the difference between developing the “High-level framework services” compared to the old architecture’s “libmoko…”? Isn’t it only a change from the GTK+ based architecture to something that can accommodate any UI toolkit? And won’t this add some confusion about what to use to build native OpenMoko applications?

By: mickeyl #1 fan

mickeyl #1 fan — Mon, 12 May 2008 15:54:31 +0000

FAIL.

By: niklauz

niklauz — Sun, 11 May 2008 01:24:38 +0000

finally! what did it take to make this happen?