<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPad? I&#8217;m loving it!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vanille-media.de/site/index.php/2010/02/01/ipad-im-loving-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vanille-media.de/site/index.php/2010/02/01/ipad-im-loving-it/</link>
	<description>Software Engineer - Author - Open Source Enthusiast</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Friedt</title>
		<link>http://www.vanille-media.de/site/index.php/2010/02/01/ipad-im-loving-it/#comment-123567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Friedt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanille-media.de/site/index.php/2010/02/01/ipad-im-loving-it/#comment-123567</guid>
		<description>I agree - it is a cool device. I especially like how they immediately paired it with 2 accessories, the keyboard, mouse, and a dock / stand, so that its functional as a tablet and a (kind-of) terminal (lacking multi-tasking, from what I hear). 

What I don't find very cool about it is that its so closed... maybe I'm wrong. I find it lame that apple can't de-couple the hardware vendor / software vendor relationship. Personally, I would really like to own an iPad, but I would much rather run my own, customized kernel &#38; software on it. What's even worse, is that apple has patents on a lot of the hardware/interface (e.g. multitouch), which means that if I want a similar hardware/interface, then I have no (or at most little) choice about who I buy that product from.

That's just my 2-cents.

In any event, good luck with LaTe development.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree - it is a cool device. I especially like how they immediately paired it with 2 accessories, the keyboard, mouse, and a dock / stand, so that its functional as a tablet and a (kind-of) terminal (lacking multi-tasking, from what I hear). </p>
<p>What I don&#8217;t find very cool about it is that its so closed&#8230; maybe I&#8217;m wrong. I find it lame that apple can&#8217;t de-couple the hardware vendor / software vendor relationship. Personally, I would really like to own an iPad, but I would much rather run my own, customized kernel &amp; software on it. What&#8217;s even worse, is that apple has patents on a lot of the hardware/interface (e.g. multitouch), which means that if I want a similar hardware/interface, then I have no (or at most little) choice about who I buy that product from.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just my 2-cents.</p>
<p>In any event, good luck with LaTe development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

